Direkt zum Inhalt

Order

page banner image

Main Details:

Case number
UPC_CFI_1/2023
Date
Parties
Amgen, Inc.
v.
Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH
Order/Decision reference
ORD_560432/2023
Type of action
Preliminary objection
Language of Proceedings
German
Court - Division
Court of First Instance - Munich (DE) Central Division - Section

Headnotes:

Preliminary objection ex Rule 48/19.1(b) RoP. For determining competence of the divisions of the UPC in the context of Article 33.4 UPCA, second sentence, the central division needs to establish if a statement of claim to bring an infringement action has been lodged at a local or regional division and, if so, at what date and time this was done. Central division competent because revocation action was filed before the infringement action. Under the circumstances that the CMS has ceased to function, in accordance with Rule 4.2 RoP, a Statement of revocation may be lodged at the Registry seated in Luxembourg or at a sub-registry.

Schlüsselwörter:

Preliminary objection, Rule 48/19.1(b) RoP, Article 33.4 UCPA, internal competence, competence central division (yes), date and time of lodging, Article 4.2 RoP, hard-copy lodging, Registry Rules