Main Details: Registry number ACT_588685/2023 Date 17 février, 2025 Parties Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd v. Laser Components SAS, Photon Wave Co.,Ltd. Order/Decision reference ORD_598577/2023 Type of action Infringement Action Language of Proceedings Français Court - Division Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division French Headnotes: Conformément à la règle 113 du RdP – Durée de l’audience, le Juge-président peut fixer des délais pour les présentations orales des parties avant l’audience. According to Rule 113.1 RoP, 1. Without prejudice to the application of the principle of proportionality, the presiding judge shall endeavour to complete the oral hearing within one day. The presiding judge may set time limits for parties’ oral submissions in advance of the oral hearing. French Mots-clés: R.113 RoP. Time limits for parties' oral submissions Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number ACT_588685/2023 Date 17 février, 2025 Parties Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd v. Laser Components SAS, Photon Wave Co.,Ltd. Order/Decision reference ORD_598577/2023 Type of action Infringement Action Language of Proceedings Français Court - Division Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division French Headnotes: Conformément à la règle 113 du RdP – Durée de l’audience, le Juge-président peut fixer des délais pour les présentations orales des parties avant l’audience. According to Rule 113.1 RoP, 1. Without prejudice to the application of the principle of proportionality, the presiding judge shall endeavour to complete the oral hearing within one day. The presiding judge may set time limits for parties’ oral submissions in advance of the oral hearing. French Mots-clés: R.113 RoP. Time limits for parties' oral submissions Back to Decisions and Orders