Main Details: Registry number APL_40553/2024 Date 20 December, 2024 Parties Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen Technology (Ireland) Unlimited Company, Amgen N.V., Amgen GmbH, Amgen AB, Amgen S.A.S., Amgen s.r.l., Amgen Biofarmacêutica Lda., Amgen Zdravila D.O.O. Order/Decision reference ORD_60221/2024 Type of action Appeal RoP220.1 Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: 1. A linguistic error, a spelling mistake or any other inaccuracy in a patent claim can only be corrected by way of interpretation of the patent claim if the existence of an error and the precise way to correct it are sufficiently certain to the average skilled person on the basis of the patent claim, taking into account the description and the drawings and using common general knowledge. 2. The patent claim must be interpreted from the perspective of the person skilled in the art. The applicant’s assertions during the grant proceedings, and in particular the TBA’s endorsement thereof, can be seen as an indication of the view of the person skilled in the art at the filing date. English Keywords: Relevance of the applicant’s assertions and the TBA’s endorsement thereof during grant proceedings for the interpretation of patent claims, Error in a patent claim, Appeal, Patent claim interpretation, Provisional measures Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number APL_40553/2024 Date 20 December, 2024 Parties Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amgen Technology (Ireland) Unlimited Company, Amgen N.V., Amgen GmbH, Amgen AB, Amgen S.A.S., Amgen s.r.l., Amgen Biofarmacêutica Lda., Amgen Zdravila D.O.O. Order/Decision reference ORD_60221/2024 Type of action Appeal RoP220.1 Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: 1. A linguistic error, a spelling mistake or any other inaccuracy in a patent claim can only be corrected by way of interpretation of the patent claim if the existence of an error and the precise way to correct it are sufficiently certain to the average skilled person on the basis of the patent claim, taking into account the description and the drawings and using common general knowledge. 2. The patent claim must be interpreted from the perspective of the person skilled in the art. The applicant’s assertions during the grant proceedings, and in particular the TBA’s endorsement thereof, can be seen as an indication of the view of the person skilled in the art at the filing date. English Keywords: Relevance of the applicant’s assertions and the TBA’s endorsement thereof during grant proceedings for the interpretation of patent claims, Error in a patent claim, Appeal, Patent claim interpretation, Provisional measures Back to Decisions and Orders