Main Details: Registry number App_60804/2024 Date 25 November, 2024 Parties DexCom, Inc. Order/Decision reference ORD_62696/2024 Type of action Generic application Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division English Headnotes: In the UPC Rules of Procedure (RoP), case management powers are not limited to the stage of the proceedings that ends with the closure of the interim procedure, until when the Judge-Rapporteur is in charge of it. On the contrary, the Court, and in particular the Presiding Judge, could exercise his/her case management powers after the closure of the interim procedure. Even after the oral hearing since the case is pending the presiding judge remains in charge of the case management as foreseen in Art. 43 UPCA and Chapter 8 of the RoP on Case management. Therefore, the DEXCOM’s application based on R 334 and R 336 RoP is admissible. However, the Court considers that this request made at a very late stage of the proceedings is not justified, since the decision in question does not concern the patent at issue in the present case, but its parent patent, which discloses another invention with similar but also different features. It follows that there is no justification in the present case for an order authorizing the reopening of the debate after the Oral hearing. English Keywords: R 336 RoP on Case management Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number App_60804/2024 Date 25 November, 2024 Parties DexCom, Inc. Order/Decision reference ORD_62696/2024 Type of action Generic application Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of First Instance - Paris (FR) Local Division English Headnotes: In the UPC Rules of Procedure (RoP), case management powers are not limited to the stage of the proceedings that ends with the closure of the interim procedure, until when the Judge-Rapporteur is in charge of it. On the contrary, the Court, and in particular the Presiding Judge, could exercise his/her case management powers after the closure of the interim procedure. Even after the oral hearing since the case is pending the presiding judge remains in charge of the case management as foreseen in Art. 43 UPCA and Chapter 8 of the RoP on Case management. Therefore, the DEXCOM’s application based on R 334 and R 336 RoP is admissible. However, the Court considers that this request made at a very late stage of the proceedings is not justified, since the decision in question does not concern the patent at issue in the present case, but its parent patent, which discloses another invention with similar but also different features. It follows that there is no justification in the present case for an order authorizing the reopening of the debate after the Oral hearing. English Keywords: R 336 RoP on Case management Back to Decisions and Orders