Main Details: Registry number APL_53968/2024 Date 11 October, 2024 Parties Microsoft Corporation v. Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy Order/Decision reference ORD_55908/2024 Type of action Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: The inadmissibility requirement under R. 361 RoP must be reserved for clear-cut cases and should not result in a full exchange of arguments and evidence, as is clear from the use of the words “manifestly inadmissible. English Keywords: Action manifestly bound to fail Back to Decisions and Orders
Main Details: Registry number APL_53968/2024 Date 11 October, 2024 Parties Microsoft Corporation v. Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy Order/Decision reference ORD_55908/2024 Type of action Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3) Language of Proceedings English Court - Division Court of Appeal - Luxembourg (LU) English Headnotes: The inadmissibility requirement under R. 361 RoP must be reserved for clear-cut cases and should not result in a full exchange of arguments and evidence, as is clear from the use of the words “manifestly inadmissible. English Keywords: Action manifestly bound to fail Back to Decisions and Orders